Version 3 2025-02-28, 06:42Version 3 2025-02-28, 06:42
Version 2 2024-12-06, 06:42Version 2 2024-12-06, 06:42
Version 1 2024-12-02, 07:04Version 1 2024-12-02, 07:04
dataset
posted on 2025-02-28, 06:42authored byToshiki Haji, Sota NikiSota Niki, Takafumi Hirata
<p>The location of analyzed sample is 35°34′42″N, 134°21′32″E. For details of the sample, refer Haji (2024, Figs. 1, 3; <a href="https://doi.org/10.5575/geosoc.2024.0027" target="_blank">10.5575/geosoc.2024.0027</a>).</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Fig. S1. </strong>(a) Photomicrograph and (b) cathodoluminescence images of the analyzed zircons. Yellow squares in (b) indicate ablation spots. The scale in (b) is 20 μm.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Table S1. </strong>Instrumentation and operating conditions of the femtosecond LA–MC–ICP–MS.(a)Laser–ablation (LA) system. (b)ICP–MS instrument.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Table S2. </strong>Isotopic data and U‒Pb ages of zircons with 2σ uncertainties (first routine). </p>
<p>"*": discordant data. "y": data of the young cluster. "o": data of the old cluster.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Table S3.</strong> Isotopic data and U‒Pb ages of zircons with 2σ uncertainties (second routine). </p>
<p>"*": discordant data. "y": data of the young cluster. "o": data of the old cluster.</p>
Funding
Re-examination of the Miocene stress field in the Southwest Japan arc