<p><strong>Fig. S1. </strong>Outcrop photographs of the sampled tephras. (a)CRGW, (b) CRG_SS, (c) ST-PF. Yellow dashed rectangles (height of rectangles: ~30 cm) denote where samples were collected.</p>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Table S1.</strong> Zircon U–Pb dating results. Data marked with #(>75% common Pb contamination) were excluded for further U–Pb analyses.</p>
<p> </p>
<ul>
<li>CRGW (sampling location coordinates: 42.616478,140.316706) measured on 09/30/2020, 10/29/2020</li>
<li>CRG_SS (sampling location coordinates: 42.607056,140.314058) measured on 09/30/2020</li>
<li>ST-PF (sampling location coordinates: 42.618414,140.325478) measured on 07/06/2021</li>
<li>Bishop Tuff (reference age: 0.767±0.001 Ma; Crowley et al., 2007) measured on 09/30/2020, 10/29/2020, 07/06/2021</li>
<li>Fish Canyon Tuff (reference age: 28.402 ± 0.023 Ma; Schmitz and Bowring, 2001) measured on 09/30/2020, 07/06/2021</li>
<li>Plešovice (reference age: 337.13±0.37 Ma; Sláma et al., 2008) measured on 09/30/2020, 10/29/2020, 07/06/2021</li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>
<ul>
<li>a_fTh/U = (Th/U)zircon/(Th/U)magma. (Th/U)magma of 4.0 ± 2.0 for unknown, 3.0 ± 1.5 for Bishop Tuff, and 2.2 ± 1.1 for Fish Canyon Tuff were used.</li>
<li>b_f<sub>206</sub>% denotes the percentage of <sup>206</sup>Pb that is common Pb and is calculated as follows: f<sub>206</sub>% = 100 × (x-0.0461)/(0.832-0.0461), where x is a measured <sup>207</sup>Pb/<sup>206</sup>Pb ratio (Ito et al., 2017).</li>
<li>c_Measured isotope ratio, that is before corrections of initial <sup>230</sup>Th and <sup>231</sup>Pa disequilibrium and common Pb.</li>
<li>d_Individual U-Pb (<sup>238</sup>U-<sup>206</sup>Pb) ages were determined using the modified <sup>207</sup>Pb method (Sakata, 2018). Error of weighted mean is shown as 95% confidence level.</li>
<li>e_MSWD: mean square weighted deviation.</li>
<li>f_Statistical outlier identified by applying 2σ criterion in Isoplot (Ludwig, 2012).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>References</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Ito, H., Spencer, C.J., Danišík, M., Hoiland, C.W., 2017. Magmatic tempo of Earth’s youngest exposed plutons as revealed by detrital zircon U-Pb geochronology. Scientific Reports, 7: 12457.</li>
<li>Ludwig K.R., 2012. User’s Manual for Isoplot 3.75: A geochronological toolkit for Microsoft Excel. Berkeley Geochronol. Center Spec. Pub., 5, 75 pp.</li>
<li>Sakata, S., 2018. A practical method for calculating the U-Pb age of Quaternary zircon: Correction for common Pb and initial disequilibria. Geochem. J., 52, 281–286.</li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>
<p><strong>Table S2.</strong> Zircon (U–Th)/He analytical results and parameters used for the disequilibrium correction.</p>
<p>TAU - total analytical uncertainty; Raw He age - (U-Th)/He age uncorrected for alpha ejection; Ft - alpha ejection correction factor after Farley et al. (1996); D(230) - parameter describing zircon-melt fractionation of <sup>230</sup>Th/<sup>238</sup>U (Farley et al., 2002; Schmitt et al., 2010) calculated as (Th/U)zircon/(Th/U)magma, whereby a value of 4 was used for (Th/U)magma and a value of 3.8 was used as D(231) (Schmitt, 2011); Diseq.-cor. He age - (U-Th)/He age corrected for disequilibrium calculated by using MCHeCalc software (Schmitt et al. 2010). </p>
<p><strong>References:</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Farley, K.A., Kohn, B.P. and Pillans, B., 2002. The effects of secular disequilibrium on (U–Th)/He systematics and dating of Quaternary volcanic zircon and apatite. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett., 201, 117–125. </li>
<li>Farley, K.A., Wolf, R.A. and Silver, L.T., 1996. The effects of long alpha-stopping distances on (U-Th)/He ages. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 60, 4223-4229.</li>
<li>Schmitt, A.K., 2011. Uranium series accessory crystal dating of magmatic processes. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 39, 321–349.</li>
<li>Schmitt, A.K., Stockli, D.F., Niedermann, S., Lovera, O.M. and Hausback, B.P., 2010. Eruption ages of Las Tres Vírgenes volcano (Baja California): a tale of two helium isotopes. Quat. Geochronol., 5, 503–511.</li>
</ul>
<p><br></p>